﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Next In Wireless</title>
	<updated>2008-07-04T05:30:22Z</updated>
	<id>http://nextinwireless.com/atom.aspx</id>
	<link rel="self" href="http://nextinwireless.com/atom.aspx" />
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blog</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Microsoft’s Defeat and the Evolving Mobile Operating System War</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/05/04/microsofts-defeat-and-the-evolving-mobile-operating-system-war.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-05-04:c0cd05ec-2431-4c21-bf04-69a3dffa6d3c</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Mobile Marketplace" />
		<updated>2008-05-06T15:44:40Z</updated>
		<published>2008-05-04T10:01:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/ballmer.jpg" border="0" width="300">&nbsp; Well, as
predicted 3 months ago <u><a href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/02/10/with-yahoo-in-play-google-mobile-advances.aspx">here</a></u>, the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is off. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>It just made no sense, and despite threats of
taking the deal into a proxy fight, </span><st1:City><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Redmond</span></st1:place></st1:City><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> backed down.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>So much for the “hostile” side of the
proposed takeover.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>To be fair, it would be
hard for that 900-pound gorilla to force its way, and not look like a total
monopoly.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Still, the aborted
attempt is enough for Microsoft’s board to consider a change in the leadership,
and try to produce some kind of innovation with its assets...<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;" lang="EN-GB">As far as mobile
goes, unless </span><st1:City style="font-weight: bold;"><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Redmond</span></st1:place></st1:City><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> wants to risk mobile extinction at the hands of
Blackberry</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">and Apple</span>, Windows Mobile (WM)7 should now attempt some very
slick things, and not just another incremental upgrade.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">(Especially given
Apple’s impending enterprise push)<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">If you just look
at Palm, WM, Blackberry, and Symbian, and look at where they’ve been and where they’re
going, you can see what Apple is doing, and how the new <a href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/04/11/new-sdk-stokes-potential-iphone-growth.aspx" target="_blank">SDK fits in</a>.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">So far Symbian
and proprietary </span><st1:City><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">OSs</span></st1:place></st1:City><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> dominate the consumer space.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>Palm is trying to hang in there, but they will probably be acquired
soon.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>And Symbian has had minimal impact
in the </span><st1:country-region><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">USA</span></st1:place></st1:country-region><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">So, Apple started
out in the space with something that combined 2 things it does very well: UI
and music player.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Oh, and they threw in
a phone with some cool features (visual voicemail...).<span style="">&nbsp; </span>It was an excellent start in a market where
they could and should leverage their strengths.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">When you look at
the enterprise marketplace, there is clearly an opening for Apple where the
incumbents (WM and Blackberry) don’t yet compete very well: a productivity phone which
is easy to deploy and support, and is intuitive and enjoyable to pick up and
use.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>(I mean, WM for a small business is
a nightmare to support!<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I’ve seen that
first hand, and eventually jumped ship.)<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Blackberry has it much
better, and their </span><st1:City><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Pearl</span></st1:place></st1:City><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> and Curve lines are mainstreaming their
phones.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The </span><st1:City><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Pearl</span></st1:place></st1:City><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> is the first rock solid business phone
(QWERTY keyboard, email, etc.) that acknowledges that the user may actually want to
listen to high quality music or snap a decent picture, and not have to use a
holster to carry it around.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I don’t
doubt that RIM could sortie a nice touch-screen phone, and so <span style="font-weight: bold;">the real
battle on the business side will be between RIM and Apple</span>, with Microsoft probably
losing share.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">The notion,
however, that Apple will somehow dominate the consumer or enterprise market
within the next 5 years is pure nonsense.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>Neither RIM nor Nokia will stand by to see their core business eroded
without a fight, and for now the i-Phone represents only a small niche of the
entire market.<br><br>Next: On Yahoo's mobile program...<br><br></font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/ballmer.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&amp;nbsp; Well, as
predicted 3 months ago &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/02/10/with-yahoo-in-play-google-mobile-advances.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;, the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is off. &lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;It just made no sense, and despite threats of
taking the deal into a proxy fight, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;st1:City&gt;&lt;st1:place&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Redmond&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:City&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt; backed down.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;So much for the “hostile” side of the
proposed takeover.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;To be fair, it would be
hard for that 900-pound gorilla to force its way, and not look like a total
monopoly.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Still, the aborted
attempt is enough for Microsoft’s board to consider a change in the leadership,
and try to produce some kind of innovation with its assets...&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;As far as mobile
goes, unless &lt;/span&gt;&lt;st1:City style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;st1:place&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Redmond&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:City&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; wants to risk mobile extinction at the hands of
Blackberry&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;and Apple&lt;/span&gt;, Windows Mobile (WM)7 should now attempt some very
slick things, and not just another incremental upgrade.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;(Especially given
Apple’s impending enterprise push...&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>New SDK Stokes Potential i-Phone Sales Growth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/04/11/new-sdk-stokes-potential-iphone-growth.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-04-11:a2ada9ee-8082-41eb-ab92-6b5492c416f4</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-04-13T13:39:38Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-11T17:36:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/i_phone_deck.png" border="0" width="240"><span style="font-weight: bold;">In the same way
the i-Phone challenged the marketplace to innovate phone design and UI,</span> the
recently-released software development kit (SDK) and it’s surrounding ecosystem
will challenge Microsoft, RIM, and Nokia (the principle owners of Symbian)
to match the kind of access developers need to make their work worthwhile.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Most notably, that would include access to
potential customers.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">As with all the
mobile operating systems (OS) owners, there’s a co-dependent relationship between
them and the developers who create applications (apps) which enhance or extend
the OS and the device which runs it.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>In
the case of the i-Phone, Apple had to provide the tools to let developers
create certified apps for the i-Phone in order to capture revenue for
distributing those software products (it’s another revenue stream for them).<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The happy by-product will be more-contented
users, a more powerful phone, and increased future sales.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Now, $99/year (and a mandatory purchase of an Apple computer) will
get a developer access to i-Tunes and a software store presence on the phone
itself, provided they don’t mind waiting for their app to be certified.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Apple’s success in engaging the developer
community with this SDK will depend on how smoothly the certification program
runs, and just how long smaller developers will have to wait while Apple
services their preferred “partners”.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Also, we know about Apple’s aspirations for making the i-Phone a viable business
phone.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>At first blush, this seems ridiculous,
but then when you think about small businesses (doctors, lawyers, or anytime an
executive’s image is important...) it makes sense. In fact, IT support or not,
there is much pleasure for users in any organization to be able to just pick up and intuitively use a
communications device, rather than to struggle with a learning curve and software
glitches.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Since Apple has licensed
Microsoft’s Active Synch with Exchange servers, they’ve broken down another enterprise
mass-deployment barrier. <o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;" lang="EN-GB">The i-Phone SDK
is most important to Apple’s ability to offer a business phone-solution, since
they more lack applications there.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This
is strategically what the SDK is all about.<o:p></o:p></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">

</span><br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>

<br></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">How successful
the i-Phone can be in the business market will also depend on how </font></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3"> primarily </font></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">RIM
and Microsoft respond with product innovation and better developer access to
the retail channel.</font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/i_phone_deck.png" border="0" width="240"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;In the same way
the i-Phone challenged the marketplace to innovate phone design and UI,&lt;/span&gt; the
recently-released software development kit (SDK) and it’s surrounding ecosystem
will challenge Microsoft, RIM, and Nokia (the principle owners of Symbian)
to match the kind of access developers need to make their work worthwhile.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Most notably, that would include access to
potential customers.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;As with all the
mobile operating systems (OS) owners, there’s a co-dependent relationship between
them and the developers who create applications (apps) which enhance or extend
the OS and the device which runs it.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;In
the case of the i-Phone, Apple had to provide the tools to let developers
create certified apps for the i-Phone in order to capture revenue for
distributing those software products (it’s another revenue stream for them).&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;The happy by-product will be...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Poisson d'Avril is Hottest New Mobile Game, Wins "Green" Stamp of Approval</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/04/01/poission-davril-tops-mobile-game-sales-wins-green-stamp-of-approval.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-04-01:31a9aa4c-dee9-41bd-9a0a-dab1b9e4d23e</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Other Wireless Gadgets" />
		<category term="Mobile Marketplace" />
		<updated>2008-04-13T21:11:49Z</updated>
		<published>2008-04-01T19:29:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Poission_davril.jpg" border="0" width="300"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">&nbsp; </span></font><b><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">As far as mobile applications go, this one should not be overlooked.</span></b><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> While shrugged-off by many
wireless carrier executives as a mere “toy”, Poisson d’Avril is gaining
major traction in the wireless world.<br><br></span><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Forget BrickBreaker, which consumes precious battery power and requires lateral
dexterity, not to mention a significant mobile-phone purchase; “Poisson” has appeared out
of nowhere to take the Best Mobile Game of the Year award at a recent CTIA
event.&nbsp; The game’s demand for constant water swishing button pushing
(thumb usage recommended) has become an addiction even the most responsible
executive cannot deny.</span><span style="" lang="EN-GB"><br> </span><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font face="Arial" size="3"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">“From the first swish I was hooked”</span></b><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">, admits Dexter Wheeler, Senior Vice President at a well-known wireless
vendor.&nbsp; “At first I was reluctant to pull out the device in public
places”, he continued, “but now, it’s difficult to take a flight without my
noting the entire business class swishing away.”<br>
On a recent coast to coast flight, Mr. Wheeler was challenged by no less than 4
fellow passengers to a “swoosh-off”, with one such game leading to the winning
of a major hardware deal.<br>
“I had him beat”, he said, “with only one ring to go on my left post.&nbsp; But
my instinct let him win, and it paid off”.</span><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br>Finding the game an effective stress-reliever, another passenger
remarked, “the flight attendants even let me play during take-offs and
landings!”</span><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span>

</font><br><br><font face="Arial" size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">An unexpected payoff to many “Poisson” players is a new found bonding
with their young children.<br>
“My daughter turned me on to it”, admitted one heavy player on a recent Amtrak
train from </span><st1:State><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Washington</span></st1:place></st1:State><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> to </span><st1:State><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">New York, which was full of solo players</span></st1:place></st1:State><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">.&nbsp; “Sometimes we have to fight for who gets to play at breakfast
time”, he said.</span></font><span style=""><o:p></o:p></span>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3"></font><o:p></o:p></span></p>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Poission_davril.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;As far as mobile applications go, this one should not be overlooked.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt; While shrugged-off by many
wireless carrier executives as a mere “toy”, Poisson d’Avril is gaining
major traction in the wireless world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Forget BrickBreaker, which consumes precious battery power and requires lateral
dexterity, not to mention a significant mobile-phone purchase; “Poisson” has appeared out
of nowhere to take the Best Mobile Game of the Year award at a recent CTIA
event.&amp;nbsp; The game’s demand for constant water swishing button pushing
(thumb usage recommended) has become an addiction even the most responsible
executive cannot deny...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>With Yahoo In Play, Google Mobile Advances</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/02/10/with-yahoo-in-play-google-mobile-advances.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-02-06:9df10121-091a-485e-9519-eb7332de83af</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Open Handset Alliance and Android" />
		<category term="Mobile Marketplace" />
		<category term="Mobile Media and Applications" />
		<updated>2008-04-13T15:01:03Z</updated>
		<published>2008-02-06T13:38:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/YahooDoor.jpg" border="0" width="300">&nbsp; <font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Looking at
Yahoo’s future in wireless is a bit presumptuous without consideration of the
<span style="font-weight: bold;">hostile mega-merger attempt launched by Microsoft last week</span>.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>So before we get to the wireless skinny,
let’s talk merger for a minute.<o:p></o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Should any merger
be eventually worked out, it would be great news for Google shareholders.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>MSFT-YHOO would need at least 2 to 3 years
to integrate their businesses and eliminate some 8000 jobs, mostly through layoffs.<o:p></o:p> </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">(Ballmer himself
claims $1B in savings.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Assuming 2/3 come
from salaries, just do the math)<o:p></o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">As morale slumps
at the joint behemoth, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Google would speed ahead, especially with its wireless
business</span>, possibly building its own network.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>And Android promises a shot of innovation into the wireless space that
many a user have been hungry for.<o:p></o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">We’ve known for
years that mobile represents the biggest growth opportunity for the web, and
hence on-line advertising.<o:p></o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">But despite </span><st1:City style="font-family: Arial;"><st1:place>Redmond</st1:place></st1:City><span style="font-family: Arial;">’s desperate attempt to establish itself
in the on-line ad business, this merger probably won’t happen.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Jerry Yang’s
apparent penchant for Yahoo’s independence (especially from Microsoft), anti-competitive
concerns, and the presence of better potential partners (which Yahoo will
likely seek out) are among my reasoning for this.<o:p></o:p>

</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Nevertheless,
Microsoft’s attempt has put Yahoo in play and (mobile market) change is on the way.<br><br>More to come...</span></font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/YahooDoor.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;Looking at
Yahoo’s future in wireless is a bit presumptuous without consideration of the
&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;hostile mega-merger attempt launched by Microsoft last week&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;So before we get to the wireless skinny,
let’s talk merger for a minute.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;Should any merger
be eventually worked out, it would be great news for Google shareholders.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;MSFT-YHOO would need at least 2 to 3 years
to integrate their businesses and eliminate some 8000 jobs, mostly through layoffs.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;(Ballmer himself
claims $1B in savings.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Assuming 2/3 come
from salaries, just do the math)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;As morale slumps
at the joint behemoth, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Google would speed ahead, especially with its wireless
business&lt;/span&gt;, possibly building its own network.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;And Android promises a shot of innovation into the wireless space that
many a user have been hungry for.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;We’ve known for
years that mobile represents the biggest growth opportunity for the web, and
hence on-line advertising...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>I can’t believe I just bought a Blackberry !</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/18/omg-i-cant-believe-i-just-bought-a-blackberry.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-01-19:8ae43aa3-60e0-4c4b-bc5d-8413e223399c</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-02-22T23:10:43Z</updated>
		<published>2008-01-19T12:10:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/8130.jpg" border="0" width="300">&nbsp; Last week, I returned the
AT&amp;T Tilt (with Windows Mobile 6) basically because I have no 3G coverage
at home (you can read more details <a href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/16/the-untilting-factors.aspx"> here</a>).<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Prior to the
return, while in the Verizon store to get ported back and return to my cluncky
Samsung i-730, <span style="font-weight: bold;">I spot the Pearl 8130.&nbsp;
What a gem!</span><o:p style="font-weight: bold;"></o:p></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">

</span><br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Long story short,
to go back to “the V” I had to do a 1-year contract, so thought I should get
something for it. (i.e. a phone subsidy)<br>So, I went for the 8130.<o:p></o:p></span>

<span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I’ve done the
Symbian thing, lived with a Palm OS Treo, done Windows Mobile 2003, 5 and tried
6.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>And now Backberry completes my tour
of operating systems. <o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I had turned my
nose up at Blackberries for years:<o:p></o:p></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br>They were too wide, obliged you to buy their server
     service<o:p></o:p>, the phone voice quality was poor<o:p></o:p>, they had greyscale screens when
     everyone else had color...<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[endif]--></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Well, the 8130
has none of these drawbacks.</span><br><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Here is my initial
reaction:<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Pluses:<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Cool trackball<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Sleek size and weight: don't need a
     holster any more; no more geek factor<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Tablet form-factor: eliminate
     thickness and moving parts, keyboard more at the ready<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Standard mini-USB charge plug can
     also be plugged into any PC for a charge<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">3.5mm standard audio out plug<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Camera has flash !<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Great screen resolution<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Voice Signal included, don’t have to
     train for each contact<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Headset and holster included<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Can get up to 10 mail accounts pushed
     to the phone<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Screen adjusts to the ambient light !<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Communications log can integrate all
     message types, calls<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The phone starts up in a second,
     unlike Windows Mobile<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Speedy surfing: looks like this
     device is EvDo Rev A, although there is no such documentation.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I got 1.6mb/s in my initial tests!<o:p></o:p></span></font></li></ul>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Minuses:<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">TheStreamCenter doesn’t work because
     there is no Windows Media Player support in the stock media player</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Cannot download podcasts/mp3 files from a web site or as a mail attachment. Could mp3 files be blocked my the Blackberry proxy server?<br></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">No music player equalizer (is one
     available?)<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Can’t seem to toggle the flash on/off
     in the camera app where I need to; have to go to settings<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Menus don’t wrap<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Only 2 programmable buttons<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">GPS is not working out of the box</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The phone is almost as slippery as a bar of soap<br></span></font></li></ul>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> </span></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">More later...<br><br></font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/8130_2.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&amp;nbsp; Last week, I returned the
AT&amp;amp;T Tilt (with Windows Mobile 6) basically because I have no 3G coverage
at home (you can read more details &lt;a href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/16/the-untilting-factors.aspx"&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Prior to the
return, while in the Verizon store to get ported back and return to my cluncky
Samsung i-730, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;I spot the Pearl 8130.&amp;nbsp;
What a gem!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;o:p style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Long story short,
to go back to “the V” I had to do a 1-year contract, so thought I should get
something for it. (i.e. a phone subsidy)&lt;br&gt;So, I went for the 8130.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;I’ve done the
Symbian thing, lived with a Palm OS Treo, done Windows Mobile 2003, 5 and tried
6.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;And now Backberry completes my tour
of operating systems. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;I had turned my
nose up at Blackberries for years:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;br&gt;They were too wide, obliged you to buy their server
     service&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;, the phone voice quality was poor&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;, they had greyscale screens when
     everyone else had color...&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;

&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Well, the 8130
has none of these drawbacks.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Here is my initial
reaction...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Sprint Looking More Vulnerable.  Where Is Carl ?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/18/sprint-looking-more-vulnerable--where-is-carl-.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-01-18:2655f07b-6d42-4b14-b526-4fe32b91b593</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Operator Business" />
		<updated>2008-01-28T13:37:09Z</updated>
		<published>2008-01-18T18:24:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/sprint_6_months_brighter.jpg" border="0" width="300">&nbsp; With the horrid
results Sprint reported today, plummeting its share price to $8.7</span> from a
high 6 months ago of $22.9,<span style="">&nbsp; </span>the stock
has now fallen some 60% (whereas the NASDAQ is down about 13% over the same
period)<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--></span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">So, I’m wondering
when someone like Mr. Icahn might put them into play. <br>(the stock is down 41.6% over the last 5 years, where the NASDAQ is up 31.5% over the same period</span>)<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-weight: bold;">I’m not talking
about the buy-and-chop-up kind of takeover, but rather the buy and turn-around kind.</span><span style="">&nbsp; </span>As in consolidate operations, unify the
branding, get the product offering back on track, and fix customer service.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I mean, I think 3
years is enough time to change the signs above the stores, and to unify the web
site!<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">In a way, <b>solid
branding is the hallmark of a heavily ad-driven consumer product like wireless
services and phones</b>.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Sprint's latest
stab at initiating change was a trial balloon about consolidating operations in
Kansas as opposed to the dynamic telecom hub of the east coast in northern
Virginia.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Uh, OK.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I guess access to and attracting top talent
might not be part of Sprint’s priorities.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;">To be fair, new
CEO <span class="ccbnttl">Dan Hesse has only been on the job a month and needs
time.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>But how long will it be before a
takeover group takes it’s case to the shareholders and proposes fast, decisive
action?<br><span style="font-weight: bold;">And if one of the cable guys came in, it would send a shock wave though the industry</span><o:p style="font-weight: bold;"></o:p></span><span style="font-weight: bold;"> in a market which has already battered the MVNOs.</span></span><br><span class="ccbnttl"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></span>

<br><span class="ccbnttl"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Either way, the market needs more competition to spur innovation, and
Sprint’s eventual </span></span></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">leveraging
of their assets and development of an irresistible offering</font><span class="ccbnttl"><font size="3">
will be good news for wireless consumers.<br><br></font><o:p></o:p></span></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/sprint_6_months_brighter.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&amp;nbsp; With the horrid
results Sprint reported today, plummeting its share price to $8.7&lt;/span&gt; from a
high 6 months ago of $22.9,&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;the stock
has now fallen some 60% (whereas the NASDAQ is down about 13% over the same
period)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;So, I’m wondering
when someone like Mr. Icahn might put them into play. &lt;br&gt;(the stock is down 41.6% over the last 5 years, where the NASDAQ is up 31.5% over the same period&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;I’m not talking
about the buy-and-chop-up kind of takeover, but rather the buy and turn-around kind.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;As in consolidate operations, unify the
branding, get the product offering back on track, and fix customer service...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Un-Tilting Factors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/16/the-untilting-factors.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-01-16:c729b008-4d6e-471d-98c1-32b4fafa01bd</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Operator Business" />
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-01-28T14:05:01Z</updated>
		<published>2008-01-16T08:18:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Red_tilt.gif" border="0" width="230">&nbsp; <span style="font-weight: bold;">Despite one’s
glazed-over eyes and zombie smile that seem to go along with the purchase of a new
PDA-phone, the reality simply cannot be known until some weeks later.</span><span style="">&nbsp; </span>Thankfully, the wireless operators acknowledge
this, and allow a 30-day trial.<o:p></o:p></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-weight: bold;">&nbsp; </span>(the cynical view
is that they know some of these phones are only half-baked)<br><br><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> Although I didn’t
have 3G coverage at home (a place I often work, as well), I tried to
rationalize keeping the Tilt.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p><br>“It has WiFi-g,
maybe that will fill the gap”, I thought.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><br>“I can even drop the data plan altogether”, I further reasoned, except
that that would rendered Google maps useless when I needed it the most.&nbsp; Besides, <span style="font-weight: bold;">nothing beats "anywhere" high-speed internet access</span>.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> </span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I was rather disappointed that the Tilt is even less
one-handed friendly then my Samsung i-730, which ran Windows Mobile 5.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>Another
important issue was about the device’s readiness out of the box.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>In several ways, I was looking at a
downgrade, even from a device which was 2 ½ years old!</span></font><span style=""> </span><o:p></o:p><br></p><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Here are some
other realities which led me to reject this product, despite its allure.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>That’s to say that prosumers and
professionals who are making their own handset choices might very well take
issue with --</span></font>

<br><br>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">...<span style="font-weight: bold;">some realities about Windows Mobile 6:</span><o:p></o:p></span>
</font><ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><font size="3"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">One must upgrade at least to Outlook
     2002 to be able to sync with your PC (this makes AT&amp;T also a partner
     with Microsoft for pushing Office 2007.<span style="">&nbsp;
     </span>Hope they get a commission out of it!)<o:p></o:p></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Fewer button mapping is available,
     only 5 verses 12 for WM5 with the Samsung i-730. This makes the Tilt less
     one-handed friendly. (There are actually more buttons to work with on the
     Tilt, but most are not programmable)<o:p></o:p></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Microsoft didn't bother fixing the
     forced reset when you swap the battery, as with WM5</span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The “note” and “speakerphone on” button is missing from
the GUI seen during a phone call</span></font></li></font></ul>

<font size="3"><li class="MsoNormal" style="">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">...<span style="font-weight: bold;">and about some
errors that were made with the hardware:</span><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The power plug gets in the way if you
     use the keyboard<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Hands-free is a non-standard
     connector, and uses the same connector as the power plug, so you can’t
     charge and use the hands-free at the same time<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">There is no included hands free,
     holster, or extra battery and the AT&amp;T store didn’t have any stock of OEM products</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The phone is too heavy to not have an
     OEM holster provided. What was I supposed to do with this thing until I
     could order a proper OEM holster (if one existed)?</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The only stereo hands-free headset which
     they could provide me in the AT&amp;T store was a generic unit, without a
     volume control.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This was another
     downgrade for me</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">You cannot power off the phone my
     pressing and holding the power button.<span style="">&nbsp;
     </span>One must rather go to the wireless manager screen (which includes a
     clutter of redundant icons)</span></font></li></ul>

</li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br></span></font></li>
<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">...<span style="font-weight: bold;">and with some
application disappointments:</span><o:p></o:p></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br></span></font>

</font><ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><font size="3"><li><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The camera takes about 3 seconds to take
     a photo after you press the button; and even longer to be ready to take
     another<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">GPS didn't work when I needed it; it
     isn't ready “out of the box”<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Can no longer "recognize"
     handwriting in Notes (convert it to text)</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The keypad is de-activated when
     accessing voicemail (problem when wanting to take a note while listening)</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">My reminders in the calendar never sounded
     off, despite audio setting being properly configured</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">No button could be mapped to the
     voice dialling application.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This
     is simply a blunder</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Can no longer enter a voicemail
     passcode in the phone application, which was useful to make one-handed
     checking of messages possible while driving</span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--></span></font></li></font></ul><font size="3"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br>The Tilt will no
doubt excel for many users.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>There is much upside, as previously discussed.&nbsp; But it's
obvious that AT&amp;T should<o:p></o:p></span></font>
:






<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">1.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Have this platform's hardware design and applications
re-evaluated / redesigned<o:p></o:p><br>2.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Include a CD with Outlook 2002 or later, to
assure that customers can sync their phone<o:p></o:p><br>3.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Better match the overall product proposition
to the reality of the handsets features and placement in the marketplace<br>4.&nbsp; Offer an OS update to users ASAP<o:p></o:p><br>5.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Accelerate their 3G rollout<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><br>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> While no operator
can do much about Microsoft’s mistakes with Windows Mobile 6, perhaps they can
reduce their product line exposure to those Redmond guys who appear more and
more to be asleep at the wheel.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><br>Or at
least oblige them to offer updates to an agreed schedule.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> </span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Needless to say, the Tilt went back.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I just expect a better overall product
design from a communicator I’m going to be using for a year or two.<br><br></span></font></li></font>]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Red_tilt.gif" border="0" width="230"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Despite one’s
glazed-over eyes and zombie smile that seem to go along with the purchase of a new
PDA-phone, the reality simply cannot be known until some weeks later.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Thankfully, the wireless operators acknowledge
this, and allow a 30-day trial.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;(the cynical view
is that they know some of these phones are only half-baked)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;





&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt; Although I didn’t
have 3G coverage in my home village (a place I often work, as well), I tried to
rationalize keeping the Tilt.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It has WiFi-g,
maybe that will fill the gap”, I thought.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I can even drop the data plan altogether”, I further reasoned, except
that that would rendered Google maps useless when I needed it the most.&amp;nbsp; Besides, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;nothing beats "anywhere" internet access...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>No 3G iPhone yet, but here are some cool vibrating icons...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/15/no-3g-iphone-yet-but-here-are-new-icons.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-01-15:948621ae-b099-4988-b0ff-dc826d4bf900</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-01-28T13:40:09Z</updated>
		<published>2008-01-15T17:23:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/iPhone_3.jpg" border="0" width="187">&nbsp; Seems like the
biggest wireless news lately is the no-news of no 3G iPhone announcement at
Macworld 2008.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3">The iPhone
remains the object of desire for many</font>, but also simply unjustified for
most.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The fact is that
while one can deal with a slower Edge connection even for most data-centric
activities, when it comes to surfing full web pages on that big beautiful
screen, you’ve got to have the speed.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>And no firmware update will give owners of the original iPhone the
speed they need.<o:p></o:p><br>Surfers are
better off using a proxy server which parses their pages accordingly.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">As for those with iPhone-envy who are waiting for the iPhone 2, my bet is that they will have to wait until June to get to pay a premium for
some 3G love.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>And early adopter iPhonies looking for a speedy connection
will have to rather focus on consuming the occasional firmware-upgrade bone they get thrown, until summer.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">It’s a great product-release strategy, and should help
Cupertino get up to the 7-8m units sold range as they approach the end of their
first year and cut the price once more...<br><br></span></font>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>I score a very cool little "burner" for 29€</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/04/i-score-a-very-cool-little-burner-for-29.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2008-01-04:7fcf7f4a-faa5-448a-86f2-b3d1cb00a9ee</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Mobile Marketplace" />
		<updated>2008-05-04T22:34:55Z</updated>
		<published>2008-01-04T09:57:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Sagem_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"> <span style="font-weight: bold;"></span>&nbsp; </span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Why can't some US operators offer sleek little gems like this to pre-pay customers for under $40?</span>&nbsp; Don't they want a competitive advantage?<br><br></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I am traveling in Europe to, among other things, bring home some prospective on which continent is truly ahead.&nbsp; Wirelessly-speaking, of course.</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Early into this adventure (which is due to wrap up Jan. 8th), <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3">I procured a wafer-thin Sagem 220 to keep me in mobile voice contact</font>.&nbsp; The marked price of only 19€ attracts me to this sleek little jewel, but that price involved turning in an old phone for a 10</span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">€ credit</span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">. Huh? Even my oldest relic is worth more than that to me, when I think of the conversations I've had with them...</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"></span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">But I am still smitten with the little phone, not even caring if there is a hands-free (there is) or a loudspeaker (there is).&nbsp; Maybe it's that nice grippy coating they used on the back of it...making me want to flip it endlessly in my pocket while waiting for it to spring to life with that infectious salsa-jive ring-tone.&nbsp; In fact, my enthusiasm is so that I don't even care if the sound is good.</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">"You don't understand, mon cherie", I explain to my friend, "I don't actually want to USE this, it's for placing on the table, between my water and wine glass..."</span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">In fact, the sound is excellent. And as the receiver of a call never pays, under the Euro-GSM rules, I am having a tough time using up my minutes.&nbsp; </span><br style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"></span></font><br>]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Sagem_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Why can't some US operators offer sleek little gems like this to pre-pay customers for under $40?&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; Don't they want a competitive advantage?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;I am traveling in Europe to, among other things, bring home some prospective on which continent is truly ahead.&amp;nbsp; Wirelessly-speaking, of course.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;Early into this adventure (which is due to wrap up Jan. 8th), &lt;font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"&gt;I procured a wafer-thin Sagem 220 to keep me in mobile voice contact&lt;/font&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The marked price of only 19€ attracts me to this sleek little jewel, but that price involved turning in an old phone for a 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;€ credit&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;. Huh? Even my oldest relic is worth more than that to me, when I think of the conversations I've had with them...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Some Nice Tilt Things, Some Annoying Things</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/12/21/some-nice-tilt-things-some-annoying-things.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-12-21:692c579c-78a2-4887-90f6-49c5b31260c7</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-01-28T14:01:05Z</updated>
		<published>2007-12-21T09:09:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[




<p style="font-family: Arial;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Tilt_question.jpg" border="0" width="200"><span style="font-weight: bold;">There are some
nice improvements with Windows Mobile 6</span>, which make the AT&amp;T Tilt a nice
phone to use.<o:p></o:p><br>There is a task
manager which is ever-present in the upper right of the Today screen, allowing
you to close any application without 6 screen taps, as before.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This, like other improvements, accomplishes
what 3<sup>rd</sup> party applications did for Windows Mobile 5.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Another example is the icon which lets you
change the orientation of the screen in one shot.<o:p></o:p><br>Also, there are more
direct links to applications than before on the Today screen.<o:p></o:p></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-weight: bold;">But an essential
function of any phone is the ability to press a button to engage voice
dialing</span>.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>With no dedicated button for
this, I looked to see if there is a way to map a button to the voice dialing application.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Nope.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>In fact the only such application is called “Voice Speed Dial”,<span style="">&nbsp; </span>but apparently each contact had to be
trained.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Not good.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Where is Voice Signal?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> </span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Some users looking to their phones to accomplish a
quick task (such as send a text message or do an internet search, etc.) will
prefer to not have to swivel and push open a device to use the keypad before
they can type.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I’m realizing that I may
be one of them, although the Tilt form-factor seems to be holding a long-term
spot in the marketplace.</span></font></p>]]></content>
		<summary>




&lt;p style="font-family: Arial;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Tilt_question.jpg" border="0" width="200"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;There are some
nice improvements with Windows Mobile 6&lt;/span&gt;, which make the AT&amp;amp;T Tilt a nice
phone to use.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a task
manager which is ever-present in the upper right of the Today screen, allowing
you to close any application without 6 screen taps, as before.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;This, like other improvements, accomplishes
what 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt; party applications did for Windows Mobile 5.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Another example is the icon which lets you
change the orientation of the screen in one shot.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, there are more
direct links to applications than before on the Today screen.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;But an essential
function of any phone is the ability to press a button to engage voice
dialing...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>I Get Tilted</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/12/14/i-get-tilted.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-12-14:d60b404e-7cf3-4f56-a8bb-63491e74df79</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-01-11T18:58:24Z</updated>
		<published>2007-12-14T16:53:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Tilt_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"><font size="3"><font size="4"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I felt like the
13</span><sup style="font-family: Arial;">th</sup></font><span style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="4"> was a lucky day for me, as I finally pulled the trigger</font> and went
for the AT&amp;T Tilt.&nbsp; It was a tough call, as the new BJ2 is very
capable, but it would have been too hard for me to give up the large touch
screen I had on my Samsung i-730. </span><br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">
So, I braved the snow and ice to trek to an AT&amp;T store, and close the deal
prior to my trip abroad.&nbsp; Now I have a mini-laptop, 3G compatible even in
Europe, to take along. </span><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">When I saw the phone on
display, I couldn’t believe it.&nbsp; It’s smaller and sleeker than I imagined,
has a brushed metal finish on the front and a grippy coating on the back.&nbsp;
Nice.&nbsp; I had been put off by the glossy button cluster on the face, but in
person it was no issue. (I guess the Internet photos all use a flash, which
exaggerate the gloss)</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">As reported all over the
'net, the build quality is excellent.&nbsp; You have to slide open and tilt and
tap on the nice keyboard a bit to know what I mean.&nbsp; When I saw some of
the improvements in the OS, I felt confident in my decision (more on that
later).</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">But the big test was if I had
3G coverage at home, and.....</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I do not.&nbsp; <img src="http://nextinwireless.com/emoticons/sad.png" border="0"></span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">So, I am not sure what I am
going to do (I did warn the sales gal about this; there is a 30-day trial
period)</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I can’t really see paying for
unlimited 3G data if I can only get Edge, so maybe I can downgrade my data
plan; let’s see.</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
<br>
</span></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">The second disappointment
came because of Microsoft.&nbsp; To sync my Tilt, I need Active Sync 4.5, which
is not compatible with my Outlook 2000.&nbsp; They suggest I upgrade.&nbsp; I
resist.&nbsp; I need a solution for this problem, too (maybe switch to
Thunderbird?).&nbsp; <br>
More later.</font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Tilt_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;I felt like the
13&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt; was a lucky day for me, as I finally pulled the trigger&lt;/font&gt; and went
for the AT&amp;amp;T Tilt.&amp;nbsp; It was a tough call, as the new BJ2 is very
capable, but it would have been too hard for me to give up the large touch
screen I had on my Samsung i-730. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;
So, I braved the snow and ice to trek to an AT&amp;amp;T store, and close the deal
prior to my trip abroad.&amp;nbsp; Now I have a mini-laptop, 3G compatible even in
Europe, to take along. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;When I saw the phone on
display, I couldn’t believe it...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Wireless Story of 2007: Open Handset Alliance / Android</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/12/06/the-wireless-story-of-2007-open-handset-alliance--android.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-12-06:74a7af9a-6916-47ec-b2a3-f3dc4a2e4529</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Open Handset Alliance and Android" />
		<category term="Mobile Marketplace" />
		<category term="Mobile Media and Applications" />
		<updated>2008-04-13T15:01:41Z</updated>
		<published>2007-12-06T11:44:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<font size="4"><span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: Arial;"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/googlephone_288.jpg" border="0" width="288"><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3">When I
first read some snippets about Google’s Android project and Open Handset
Alliance (OHA) initiative, I thought, “People are going to</font></span></font><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <font size="3">have phones that are accessible to all developers,
allowing them phones which are incredibly flexible and original.&nbsp; And,
users will be able to customize their phone right down to the main screen
layout!”</font></span><font size="3"> <br><span style="font-family: Arial;">&nbsp;</span> <br><span style="font-family: Arial;">I dreamt of a day where Skype could run unfettered
on a phone, making international conversation air-time free, and mobile surfing
became practical and speedy.&nbsp; And that swift connection (with low latency)
truly opened a world of information and web-based applications to all mobile
humanity, myself included.&nbsp; And to pay for it all, I would see (and
ignore) ads along the way.</span> <br><span style="font-family: Arial;">&nbsp;</span> <br><span style="font-family: Arial;">But while most operators have joined OHA, they
are the gatekeepers regarding whether and how applications can use their
networks and it remains to be seen just how OHA fits into their revenue models.<o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;">Irregardless, there is a
related initiative which makes things even more interesting:</span> <br><span style="font-family: Arial;">Google (the leader of this new paradigm) says
it will bid for 700 Mhz spectrum in the upcoming FCC auction.&nbsp; Speculation
for months has been that they are hot to build their own wireless network; I
suppose to guarantee an open channel to ad revenue growth.</span> <br></font>





<span style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="3">They would indeed need to have the desire (and
partnerships) to accomplish this, and <span style="">&nbsp;</span>to guarantee the level of network access needed to make the dream
a reality.<br><br>
But just as the i-phone raised the bar for handset quality and usability, just
the prospect of Google building an alternative wireless network could encourage
operators to provide the access and low latency which is needed.&nbsp;</font>
 </span><span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: Arial;"><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3">If they do, there may never be a
need for Google to build any network.</font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/googlephone_288.jpg" border="0" width="288"&gt;&lt;font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"&gt;When I
first read some snippets about Google’s Android project and Open Handset
Alliance (OHA) initiative, I thought, “People are going to&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt; &lt;font size="3"&gt;have phones that are accessible to all developers,
allowing them phones which are incredibly flexible and original.&amp;nbsp; And,
users will be able to customize their phone right down to the main screen
layout!”&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;I dreamt of a day where Skype could run unfettered
on a phone, making international conversation air-time free, and mobile surfing
became practical and speedy.&amp;nbsp; And that swift connection (with low latency)
truly opened a world of information and web-based applications to all mobile
humanity, myself included.&amp;nbsp; And to pay for it all, I would see (and
ignore) ads along the way.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;But while most operators have joined OHA, they
are the gatekeepers...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Why I like the Blackjack 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/11/29/why-i-like-the-blackjack-2.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-29:ea08d654-3050-4d80-a21a-18c64fd09c8a</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-04-11T20:29:20Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-29T16:34:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/samsung_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">It’s
no secret that I am in the market</span></font><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"> <font size="3">for a new PDA-phone, and the Blackjack II (BJ2), which hit last week at
AT&amp;T, has caught my eye.&nbsp; </font></span><font size="3"><br></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span lang="EN-GB">
<br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I tried the Motorola Q, a
similar PDA-phone, for a couple of weeks back in August and was definitely
digging the ultra-thin form-factor.&nbsp; What I didn’t like was that it’s too
wide (the BJ2 is 2.3 in. wide versus the Q’s 2.6 in.), which made it less
attractive for talking and perhaps pocketing.</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br>
The slim profile is a happy result of avoiding the ubiquitous slider, which
only adds thickness to a phone.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>After
all, there are always tradeoffs, in this case between the practicality of the
keyboard being always at the ready and in preserving the design line.</span></font></p>





<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">But what else is
it that makes me want to buy a Blackjack II?&nbsp;</span><br><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Perhaps it’s the hope that
Windows Mobile 6 will be better than 5: faster, handle Bluetooth connections
better, more power controls.&nbsp; </span><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Could it be the upgraded
features like a 1700 mAh battery, (as opposed to the 950 mAh that came with the
BJ1) which I hope will be power plenty? (apparently, the power management is
improved, too)</span><span lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Maybe I am willing to excuse
the lack of touch screen for the one-handed ease of using the jog wheel (i-pod
style).&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">And how about loving the integration of a GPS
receiver, which is only now starting to appear on mobile phones?</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;" lang="EN-GB"> <br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Maybe I’m thinking that a 2.4 in screen is big enough,
and downsizing from my 2.8 in screen is worth it to have the device thinness,
save power, and have the keyboard always ready to go.&nbsp; And since the
resolution is still 320 x 240, everything will look razor sharp.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;" lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Could I be thinking about how I’d be able to rock 3G
even on my Christmas trip to France, with the tri-band HSDPA support? (or even
swap my SIM card into another phone, since it’s a GSM phone!)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;" lang="EN-GB"> <br>
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Perhaps I like getting an IM and RSS client
pre-installed, making the package more complete out-of-the-box.&nbsp; And that
there’s enough RAM to run everything (128 M<img src="http://nextinwireless.com/emoticons/cool.png" border="0">.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;" lang="EN-GB"> <br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">And there’s nothing wrong with the fact that AT&amp;T
will throw in 1500 monthly text/IM/MMS messages with my data plan, whereas the
big V is still clipping me at 10 cents a pop for messages going in or out.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;" lang="EN-GB"> <br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">True, the BJ2 is missing WiFi, but if my house is
covered by their 3G goodness, then I’m fine with that.&nbsp; I’m keeping my
fingers crossed...</span></font>]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/samsung_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&lt;font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13.5pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;It’s
no secret that I am in the market&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt; &lt;font size="3"&gt;for a new PDA-phone, and the Blackjack II (BJ2), which hit last week at
AT&amp;amp;T, has caught my eye.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-GB"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;I tried the Motorola Q, a
similar PDA-phone, for a couple of weeks back in August and was definitely
digging the ultra-thin form-factor.&amp;nbsp; What I didn’t like was that it’s too
wide (the BJ2 is 2.3 in. wide versus the Q’s 2.6 in.), which made it less
attractive for talking and perhaps pocketing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-GB"&gt; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The slim profile is a happy result of avoiding the ubiquitous slider, which
only adds thickness to a phone.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;After
all, there are always tradeoffs, in this case between the practicality of the
keyboard being always at the ready and in preserving the design line.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;





&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;But what else is
it that makes me want to buy a Blackjack II?...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Kindle is a $400 E-book reader from Amazon.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/11/the-kindle-is-a-400-ebook-reader-from-amazon.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-26:64cccb72-1e06-479e-b9d0-19a0992e9285</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Other Wireless Gadgets" />
		<category term="Mobile Media and Applications" />
		<updated>2008-04-13T14:58:18Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-26T16:25:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/kindle_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"> <br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Just not sure who
will buy one.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>It’s got an odd (retro?)
form-factor, has a monochrome screen, and will likely break within 2 years
(“last as long as a Blackberry” is how Mr. Bezos put it).<o:p></o:p></span>



<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>



<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="4">The coolest thing
about the Kindle is it’s wirelessness!</font><span style=""><font size="4">&nbsp;</font>
</span>A free 3G connection (via Sprint’s network) allows users to shop for and
download books, magazines, and newspapers, with only the device and the desire.<o:p></o:p></span>



<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span>



<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">I’ve often
wondered why electronics didn’t integrate phone chips.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>We can only hope this is the start of a
deluge.<br><o:p></o:p></span>



<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Hey, reminds me of a
great product idea...</span></font><br>
<br><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>

]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>The Perverse Reality About Stereo Bluetooth Headsets</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/11/25/the-perverse-reality-about-stereo-bluetooth-headsets.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-25:6bdb5a08-94d3-4e87-8ed7-a8feace29158</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Bluetooth Reality" />
		<updated>2008-01-21T21:36:13Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-25T17:06:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Bluetooth_Headphones_200.jpg" border="0" width="200"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="4">A stereo Bluetooth device
promises not only early adopter prestige, but previous-track and next-track
controls which you don’t see on corded headsets.</font><span style="">&nbsp; </span>And there is the freedom from those dang tangly wires!<o:p></o:p></span></font>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> But while stereo Bluetooth
headsets have their advantage, I’m disappointed by their sound.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Then I realized that what was missing was
the audio enhancement what is “SRS WOW”, which is basically a software
equalizer on my phone. (SRS labs has licensed the technology to a host of
products)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">If I listen on my phone with
a wire, I can turn on SRS and WOW, it sounds much better! (base enhancement,
3-D sound) <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Not so when playing the same
tune over my Bluetooth headset.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This
sound enhancement doesn’t cross the Bluetooth bridge.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Credit goes to IO Gear for
producing the only Bluetooth headset I know of which has licensed SRS WOW, and
their Bluetooth Audio Transport presumably can enhance audio from ANY phone.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">But despite the allure of
stereo Bluetooth:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The sound quality may be worse than wired
     headsets<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">You must have direct line of sight between your
     phone and your Bluetooth, otherwise you will experience the infamous
     “skipping” of your audio content<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">You have to keep your Bluetooth charged – hard
     enough to always be ready with a spare battery for your phone, but to have
     your BT always ready? (The battery is hard-wired; no swapping possible)<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">You may also have to hassle with “profiles” to
     toggle between audio and phone calls. I had this problem with Windows
     Mobile 5, but others report it works perfectly.... <o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Your phone battery will discharge faster if you
     have Bluetooth pairing turned on<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">For all of these “features”, you have to pay for
     the device!<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></font></li></ul>



<font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">It’s
amazing we even bother.<br><br></span></font>]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Bluetooth_Headphones_200.jpg" border="0" width="200"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;A stereo Bluetooth device
promises not only early adopter prestige, but previous-track and next-track
controls which you don’t see on corded headsets.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;And there is the freedom from those dang tangly wires!&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;



&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt; But while stereo Bluetooth
headsets have their advantage, I’m disappointed by their sound...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Maybe Wires Beat Stereo Bluetooth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/11/24/maybe-wires-beat-bluetooth.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-24:287ca824-c03d-4897-ba5b-7f0d3a1ac733</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Bluetooth Reality" />
		<updated>2008-01-21T21:42:25Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-24T17:29:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/samsung_stereo_headset_blackjack_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="4">After slicing and dicing my
original wired headset which came with my Samsung i-730, in an effort to
restore it’s stereo goodness</font>, I realized 2 things:<o:p></o:p></span></font>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">1.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>You can’t really repair these things at home once the wires break
and fray on the inside, usually at the earbuds or the connector jack.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">2.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I would have to explore the (wireless) stereo Bluetooth world to
restore that music to my ears.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Having explored that path,
attempting to repair my Nokia HS-12W, and springing for the Plantronics Voyager
855, I now repent my reproach of the wire.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I finally received the
correct order of my OEM Samsung replacement headset, and I am hearing the
quality stereo sound that I was missing.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Yeah, I know, they are
meager earbuds, but given that the SRS Wow equalizer feature on my phone
doesn’t walk the “Bluetooth bridge”, the wire actually sounds better.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">And
it just works.</span></font>]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/samsung_stereo_headset_blackjack_300.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;After slicing and dicing my
original wired headset which came with my Samsung i-730, in an effort to
restore it’s stereo goodness&lt;/font&gt;, I realized 2 things...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Bluetooth Solution Part 2: the Voyager 855 Judgment Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/11/18/bluetooth-redemption-part-2-the-voyager-855-judgment-day.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-18:103b85d9-9485-4750-8420-f253631a198f</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Bluetooth Reality" />
		<updated>2008-04-11T20:14:39Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-18T17:59:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Untitled_1_copy.gif" border="0" width="222"><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3">As part of my search for the
ultimate stereo Bluetooth solution, </font><font size="3">I surfed around</font>, finding the following potential suitors:<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Moto S9<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Helium Digital’s HDBT-700</span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Sony DBRT21<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">JabraBT8010<o:p></o:p></span></font></li></ul>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> </span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">But since I need a good microphone which would let my callers understand me in all conditions, these all fail on
that count.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>You cannot convince me that
these options, as attractive as they appear, will allow good voice</span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> capture with the microphone directed 170 degrees in the opposite direction.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>At least a small boom gives one a chance...<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Then I got to thinking about
the buds v. independent plug v. fixed plug v. padded v. cups methods of
providing maximum sound translation and comfort.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The 855 uses independent plugs, as there is one for each ear, allowing
freedom of movement and maximum sound translation.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This just makes sense to me.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I don’t like the other
options because:<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Buds sound like crap, partially because they are
     too loose in your ear.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I tried
     Earjams with my plugs, which were a big improvement, but made the plugs protrude
     from my head something weird.<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">A fixed plug, like the Moto S9 would seem to
     work only if my head was exactly the right size, and even then might get
     painful if I had to jerk my head suddenly to check if that idiot in the
     Beemer was about to mow me down.<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I have had padded, behind the neck phones, and
     they do get hot, although I think this method is the 2<sup>nd</sup> best
     option (there is potential to deliver better sound than with the plugs)<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The cups might work at home, but unless I was a
     DJ living in Zurich, I would prefer to leave them there.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>(plus I’d have no chance of hearing
     that Beemer, if he did decide to give me an audible heads-up that he was
     about to wipe me out)<o:p></o:p></span></font></li></ul>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Besides the call-static
problem mentioned previously, the second and last disappointment I had is
caused by the same limitation: the occasional “skipping” of music and
podcasts.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I think both these problems
are caused my a lack of sufficient power to overcome likely path losses, such
as those encountered with clothing or your own body.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Nevertheless, I decided to
try living with the 855 for a week to see how I felt with them.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>At this point, I don’t think there is any
“ultimate” solution, but rather a “best available”.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>And that seems to be all too often the choice we are making, with
wireless.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">My cold-weather bike ride
with the 855 was a big success.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I had
trouble with my ski-headband forcing the main piece into my ear canal – a bit
uncomfortable – but finally got things adjusted.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I kept my phone in a pouch in front, and I guess my position
allowed a virtual line-of-site, because I only heard a skip if I turned my head
to look at traffic.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Knowing the sound quality
could be richer, I felt like this was the best possible solution for a ride,
since I could still hear the music really well, avoid skips, skip forward to
the next song, and take an incoming call.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">While I missed the sound
quality of the wire, the phone call quality was excellent.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Also, considering the
conditions in which I listen to music and podcasts, i.e. out in the world,
excellent sound quality has limited use anyway, since the world is noisy and
you have to be somewhat aware of your surroundings.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>(I prefer to keep the audio in the background, unless I am bored
on a train...)<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I think if you want to run
with only 1 BT for all uses (which makes practical sense), the 855 is an
excellent choice.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Oddly, after a week of use
and following a charge, I suddenly couldn’t get the 855 to turn on!<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Without the time or patience to deal with
any sort of customer service, I simply returned the unit to Best Buy, which
obliged me with an easy refund.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="3">Oh well, better luck next
time...<br><br></font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/Untitled_1_copy.gif" border="0" width="222"&gt;&lt;font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"&gt;As part of my search for the
ultimate stereo Bluetooth solution, &lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;I surfed around&lt;/font&gt;, finding the following potential suitors:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;

&lt;ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"&gt;&lt;li class="MsoNormal" style=""&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;Moto S9&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class="MsoNormal" style=""&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;Helium Digital’s HDBT-700&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class="MsoNormal" style=""&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;Sony DBRT21&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class="MsoNormal" style=""&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;JabraBT8010&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;But since I need a good microphone which would let my callers understand me in all conditions, these all fail on
that count.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;You cannot convince me that
these options, as attractive as they appear, will allow good voice&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt; capture with the microphone directed 170 degrees in the opposite direction.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;At least a small boom gives one a chance...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Sprint Played Softball for Too Long</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/11/15/sprint-played-softball-for-too-long.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-15:e9c218e7-36ab-4418-b6a6-fd4abe361dc3</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Operator Business" />
		<updated>2008-01-21T21:44:05Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-15T14:16:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/sprint_longterm.jpg" border="0" width="300">&nbsp; <b>In observing the events leading up to Gary
Forsee’s removal as Sprint CEO in October,</b> and the company’s ensuing
abandonment of their WiMax-service partnering with Clearwire, one thing becomes
obvious.&nbsp; Well, 3 things.&nbsp; The first is so obvious I don’t even have
to say it: Large mergers rarely work in tech (see HP-Compaq, Alcatel-Lucent,
etc.), and equity is destroyed.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>Sprint-Nextel is no exception.</span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial Unicode MS&quot;;"><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>





<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The second is that post-merger decisions can’t
be done by committee.&nbsp; It can’t be done by canvassing employees to see
what strategy they prefer, or where they want to work (Sprint’s operations are
still split between Kansas City and the Washington DC area).&nbsp; <o:p></o:p><br>The merger execution has to be a bit
dictatorial.&nbsp; The corporate office has to issue marching orders, and
directors must execute.&nbsp; (similar holds for corporate re-organizations)<o:p></o:p><br>Otherwise the mergers are even more
vulnerable to losing market share than they already are.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The third thing is tied to the second: A
firm implementation plan for what to do with the network assets, handset
product lines, services offering, billing, and customer service has to be
completed within the first 3 months.&nbsp; Sure, there must be plenty of
fact-finding and weighing of options during this time, but then the orders have
to come.&nbsp; The following 12-18 months need to be about executing the plan.</span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Despite the problems with Sprint’s
difficult merger, I look forward to seeing them leverage their assets and
ultimately offering an irresistible proposition to the marketplace.<o:p></o:p></span></font><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><br></span></font></p><font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Until Sprint can become competitive, there’s clearly
less incentive for “the other guys” to do some innovating and to offer
consumers a better deal.<br><br></span></font>]]></content>
		<summary>
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style=""&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/sprint_longterm.jpg" border="0" width="300"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;In observing the events leading up to Gary
Forsee’s removal as Sprint CEO in October,&lt;/strong&gt; and the company’s ensuing
abandonment of their WiMax-service partnering with Clearwire, one thing becomes
obvious.&amp;nbsp; Well, 3 things.&amp;nbsp; The first is so obvious I don’t even have
to say it: Large mergers rarely work in tech (see HP-Compaq, Alcatel-Lucent,
etc.), and equity is destroyed.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;Sprint-Nextel is no exception...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>In Search of Stereo Bluetooth Solution: the Plantronics Voyager 855</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2008/01/11/in-search-of-stereo-bluetooth-redemption-the-plantronics-voyager-855.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-14:9ac941a3-c271-4e81-bd7e-53bf0d94ed03</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="Bluetooth Reality" />
		<updated>2008-02-10T22:01:21Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-14T17:49:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/voyager855.jpg" border="0" width="250">After 2 months of naked irradiating
talk without a wire or Bluetooth, I went seeking the ultimate Bluetooth
solution</span></b><span style="font-family: Arial;">. (I detest wires, anyway)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">And having spontaneously
purchased a Jabra 125 for hands-free use, a static prone starter set, I decided
it was time to go exchange it.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">This time, I went for a
relatively expensive Plantronics Voyager 855 stereo Bluetooth headset. (I’ll
refer to any stereo Bluetooth headset simply as “BT”)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The word was, as I read BT
reviews online, that BTs cannot touch the sound quality you get with a wire.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>That would probably explain why Apple is so
anti-Bluetooth regarding their mobile products.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Fair enough.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The problem with a wire is
that I have never used one that didn’t break after 1 year of normal use. That
fact may be OK for a mono headset that you can replace for 20 bucks, but for
$120+ BT headset, which my Nokia HS-12W was, that ain’t cool. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;">It seems that if a
product is for wireless use, by decree it must break within a year or two of
purchase.</span></b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="">&nbsp; </span>As we all know, this is unacceptable.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>But we all buy anyway because we have no real quality choice.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">As I scanned the options at
Best Buy, I recalled the excellent Mobile Burn roundup that concluded that none
of their contestants had acceptable sound quality AND compatibility.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>So they were all off my list.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The Plantronics had not been considered, so
what did I have to lose?<span style="">&nbsp; </span>If it sucked,
I would return it.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>





<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The Plantronics Voyager 855
has a classic Bluetooth main piece, and an add-on<span style="">&nbsp; </span>plastic ear loop attached to a wire, which leads to another ear
plug (called a “stereo plug-in cable”). <o:p></o:p><br>At least if this wire broke,
I would be left with a decent monaural Bluetooth earpiece, assuming that the
performance was decent.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>





<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">But there was another nice
surprise about this design.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The wire
actually has a cloth shell.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This should
keep it flexible in the cold, and, hell, maybe it will actually last for a
while.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Time will tell.<o:p></o:p><br>(I also later noticed that
you can order a replacement stereo plug-in cable.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>If I kept the BT, I would order a spare straight-away)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">After the charge (and
dinner), I jammed the main piece into my ear and was surprised at how well it
a) insulated sound and b) seemed set to actually stay in!<span style="">&nbsp; </span>But I have to say, you have to be used to
using ear plugs; some can’t do it.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I was amused to read instructions
about how to screw the main piece into my ear.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>These guys had obviously thought of everything, because it actually
worked to snug the thing in comfortably, though I had the odd sensation that I
was preparing to sleep in a cheap hotel in Madrid. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>After snugging the sidecar piece into my other ear and walking a
bit, I could only hear the thump thump of my steps.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>This is what I call isolation!<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>I later discovered how to back them off a bit to allow the real world
into the background. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I checked out the action on
the telescoping boom.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Now, I don’t know
about you, but I prefer to talk into a microphone (mic), not into the air and
hope the mic picks up my voice.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Sure,
the marketing guys will tell you about how these BT devices are designed with
directional mics, but that doesn’t help trying to be discrete in your
conversation.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I appreciated the boom
gig, which at least got the mic closer to my mouth.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Also, the 855 boasted “Audio IQ”, perhaps a technology that would
actually make me better understood. (this is the weakest point about any
hands-free device.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>(The ultimate test
is calling your father, or a friend’s father)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">My first test was a walk
around the neighborhood and a chat with dad.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>He actually didn’t remark about the connection, meaning it was
excellent.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>But when I put my phone into
my jacket pocket, the static came.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>In
fact the static seemed to image my stride, as if there was some secondary
pickup from my phone, even though the BT was paired with my phone.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Weird.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">So, static disappointed me
once again.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>My Nokia HS-12W and the
Jabra both had static in this situation, hence my assertion: <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="4">Bluetooth headsets in
general only work static free in open free-space.</font><span style=""><font size="4">&nbsp;</font> </span><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">That means if you clip your
phone to your left hip and BT into your right ear, you will have static.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I dare anyone to prove me wrong with any BT
which is on the market today!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">So, I finished my
conversation holding my phone in my hand in front of me; ridiculous considering
the whole point of a wireless link between my ear and my phone.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Does this nix the 855?<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">No, because they all do
this.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Later, in my office I had 2
impeccable conversations with the phone sitting on the desk.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>



<font size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial;">More
later...<br><br></span></font>]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/voyager855.jpg" border="0" width="250"&gt;After 2 months of naked irradiating
talk without a wire or Bluetooth, I went seeking the ultimate Bluetooth
solution&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;. (I detest wires, anyway)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;And having spontaneously
purchased a Jabra 125 for hands-free use, a static prone starter set, I decided
it was time to go exchange it.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;This time, I went for a
relatively expensive Plantronics Voyager 855 stereo Bluetooth headset. (I’ll
refer to any stereo Bluetooth headset simply as “BT”)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;The word was, as I read BT
reviews online, that BTs cannot touch the sound quality you get with a wire.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;That would probably explain why Apple is so
anti-Bluetooth regarding their mobile products.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Fair enough...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>I'm Holding Off On the i-Phone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://nextinwireless.com/2007/11/01/im-waiting-on-the-iphone.aspx" />
		<id>tag:nextinwireless.com,2007-11-01:d6e3f56f-1f35-4384-bf60-664ca3a9b093</id>
		<author>
			<name>Rob</name>
		</author>
		<category term="PDA-Phone Perspectives" />
		<updated>2008-01-21T21:45:23Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-01T16:07:00Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/I_phone_300.png" border="0" width="300">&nbsp; <font size="4">I am completely
dissuaded from the i-phone.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I’ve awoken
from the spell...</font><o:p></o:p></span>

<br><br>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">There are too
many things I would miss (verses my current kit):<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<ul style="margin-top: 0pt;" type="square"><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">High-speed mobile browsing<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Skype over 3G <o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Writing a quick note on the screen<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Being able to add software<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Audio notes<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Having a tethering option<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">A physical QWERTY<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Stereo Bluetooth<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Easy contact search<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Task Sync<o:p></o:p></span></font></li><li class="MsoNormal" style=""><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Outlook email sync<o:p></o:p></span></font></li></ul>

<font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--></span></font><font style="font-family: Arial;" size="3"> I'd also like to see video capture and GPS in any new phone I go for, being as all high-end phones have them now.</font><br style="font-family: Arial;"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">Also, I don’t
like supporting a closed ecosystem, where I would be obligated to use i-tunes
as a conduit to my PC’s PIM info, and have to buy software only from Apple, etc.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->&nbsp;<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><font size="3"><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB">The way I see it,
Apple consumers are willing to sacrifice features, freedom and value for some
best-of-breed implementations and the cool factor.<o:p></o:p></span></font>

<br><span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"><font size="3">That’s just not
me.<br><br>Although, I will be keeping my fingers crossed for the i-Phone 2...<br><br></font><o:p></o:p></span>

]]></content>
		<summary>&lt;span style="font-family: Arial;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://images.quickblogcast.com/111961-104553/I_phone_300.png" border="0" width="300"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;font size="4"&gt;I am completely
dissuaded from the i-phone.&lt;span style=""&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;I’ve awoken
from the spell...&lt;/span&gt;</summary>
	</entry>
</feed>